To understand anātma mithyātva we must first grasp what mithyā means. Vedānta distinguishes three categories of existence. At one end is asat, that which never exists, like the horns of a rabbit. Grammatically one may form a sentence about rabbit’s horns poking a bear, but such a statement is false because rabbits have no horns. At the other end is sat, that which is true in all three phases of time – past, present, and future. Truth must be changeless; if something is true today but false tomorrow, it cannot be called truth. Between these two lies mithyā, that which appears and is experienced but does not have independent existence.
Consider a golden bracelet. It exists, you can wear it, touch it, and experience it. Yet upon deeper analysis, the bracelet has no existence of its own. Its existence is lent by gold. If the bracelet is melted into a ring, the name, form, and function change, but the gold remains. Thus ornaments are mithyā; gold alone is sat. This analogy prepares us to see how the world itself borrows existence from a deeper substratum.
In our transactional reality (vyavahārika satta), everything we experience is mithyā. Science may describe gold as atoms, quarks, and quantum vibrations, but Vedānta points out that even these are revealed only in consciousness. Consciousness is the upādāna kāraṇam – the material cause, not in the sense of producing matter, but as the substratum in which matter appears. Without the observer, nothing is observed. Without consciousness, particles remain only in potential. Consciousness lends existence to every form, yet remains unchanged.
All matter exists only seemingly in Brahman. Names and forms are superimposed due to ignorance (avidyā). This superimposition is called māyā, which makes us see plurality. Correct knowledge dissolves avidyā and reveals advaita dṛṣṭi – the vision of non‑duality. When we see that everything is mithyā, attachment to body (sūkṣma śarīra) and causal layers (kāraṇa) is negated. They too are non‑Self (anātma), freeing us from karmic bondage and opening the way to jīvanmukti.
The knowledge of a table is revealed through sensory perception, illumined by consciousness. Closing the eyes does not destroy the table; it only removes the knowledge of the table from your experiential field. When we say “the table is,” the is‑ness is nothing but existence shining in consciousness. Existence, knowledge, and consciousness are not separate – they are the same radiance of reality.
In transactional reality (vyavahārika satta), existence is always tied to knowability. A carpenter cannot make a table without first having knowledge of a table; a goldsmith cannot fashion a bracelet without knowledge of gold. Every object we speak of or create presupposes prior knowledge of its material and form. Thus, in everyday language, existence presupposes knowability – to exist is to be knowable. Yet Vedānta points out that this very dependence reveals a deeper truth: in the absolute standpoint (pāramārthika satta), existence and knowledge are not two separate conditions but one and the same radiance of consciousness. What we call “sat” and “cit” are inseparable; existence itself is nothing but the shining of pure awareness.
The mind is not the source of knowledge; it is a reflective medium. This reflection is called chidābhāsa. Consider a person in a coma. Consciousness is never absent; only the body‑mind has lost its ability to reflect it. When recovery happens, consciousness does not newly appear – it was always present. Similarly, a baby’s reflexes and instincts are not created by the mind; they are encoded knowledge, operative only because consciousness illumines them. DNA itself is meaningful only in the light of consciousness.
The body, senses, and mind borrow existence from consciousness. They are mithyā, not sat. Recognizing their borrowed reality dissolves attachment and reveals the freedom of the true Self. Thus, anātma‑mithyātva means: the non‑Self is not absolutely real. It appears, functions, and is experienced, but its existence is dependent, borrowed, and ultimately negated in the vision of Brahman.
When the mithyā nature of anātma is understood, the seeker abides as pure awareness – untouched, unchanging, ever free. This vision is not theoretical; it is the lived freedom of jīvanmukti. To see the world as mithyā is not to deny experience, but to recognize its borrowed existence. In that recognition, bondage falls away, and the Self shines as the only sat.
Leave a Reply